How To Reject An Idea

How To Reject An Idea

Maybe you found yourself in a brainstorming session sitting next to someone who just kept throwing out so many crazy thoughts that you want to suspend the “no idea is a bad idea” rule, or maybe you were in a leadership role and an employee’s best efforts to come to you with “solutions instead of problems” just kept coming up short. We’ve all been in situations where we’ve had to reject bad ideas.

Yes, we want to believe that no idea is a bad idea. But some ideas truly are terrible.

Rejecting ideas, especially rejecting ideas in a leadership role, is difficult.

How you respond to new ideas when they’re first presented dramatically effects the culture of your team. People will be watching your reaction (or hearing about it later) and using it to judge whether new ideas are welcome and whether the social environment of your team supports the creativity they already have. Reject too many ideas, or reject a promising idea too quickly, and people will stop sharing their brilliance with you.

Complicating that, is the natural bias we all have against creative ideas just for their newness. Research reveals that, while we might say we want creative ideas, when new ideas are presented to us, our most common reaction is to judge them negatively simply because they are new. You might unknowingly be rejecting a great idea and joining the ranks of the Xerox executives who rejected the personal computer or the Kodak executives who rejected the digital camera.

That’s why the best way to reject ideas isn’t to reject them. Instead, question the assumptions behind the idea.

Don’t say “No, that won’t work because…” Instead, ask “What would have to be true for that to work?” and allow the other person to investigate those assumed truths.

Don’t say “I don’t agree with that.” Instead, say “It sounds like your idea is the result of this assumption or perspective, and I’m not sure we know if that assumption is true.”

When you question assumptions, you don’t send the message that ideas aren’t welcome nor do you succumb to our bias against new ideas. Instead, you invite the other person (or persons) into the process of testing the idea with you. If you’re right, and their idea is a bad idea, they’ll come to realize it as they investigate further. And you’re wrong, and their idea is smarter than you thought, you won’t be seen as having squashed their brilliance.

In either case, you’ve sent a message to others that new ideas are indeed welcome, but that all ideas are worth testing.

This article originally appeared as an episode of the DailyBurk, which you can follow on YouTubeFacebook, LinkedIn,or Instagram.

Thanks for reading. You can get more actionable ideas in my popular email newsletter. Each week, I share educational (and entertaining) videos, articles, and podcasts that will help you and your team do your best work ever. Over 40,000 leaders just like you have subscribed. Enter your email now and join us.

HOME_AboutDavidBurkus

About the author

David Burkus is an organizational psychologist, keynote speaker, and bestselling author of five books on leadership and teamwork.

Recommended Reading

How Paul O’Neill Fought For Safety At Alcoa

  By most accounts, Paul O’Neill’s first speech as the new CEO of Alcoa was a complete failure. The speech was given in a hotel ballroom not far from Wall Street, and it was meant for the investors and analysts who did business just a few blocks away. The last few years the aluminum manufacturing […]

Introverts Are Great Leaders [4 Reasons]

There is a misconception about leadership that just won’t seem to go away. It’s the commonly held belief that the best leaders are charismatic and inspiring and hence, the best leaders are highly extroverted. Too many people still seem to believe that extroverts make better leaders than introverts. In a survey of senior corporate executives, […]

Path-Goal Theory

What Is The Path-Goal Theory Of Leadership? Path-Goal theory is half leadership, half motivational theory. It was developed to explain how leaders motivate their followers toward a determined end. It is derived from expectancy theory, which argued that employees will be motivated if they believe that a) putting in more effort will yield better job performance, b) better […]

Scroll to Top