Leader-Member Exchange Theory

What Is Leader-Member Exchange Theory?

Originally referred to as the “vertical dyad linkage theory,” Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) has been the subject of much research (and an upgraded name). LMX focuses on the interactions between leaders and an individual follower. The leader’s relationship to the follower unit as a whole is viewed as a series of these individual relationships. These relationships are referred to as vertical dyads. Leadership’s focus, then, should be on developing these dyads.

LMX separates these relationships into two groups: the in-group and the out-group. Researchers have found that those classified as part of the leader’s in-group are often more productive. They are given more trust and take on extra roles within the organization. In contrast, out-group members receive the standard job benefits and respond by performing up to the standard job description. More recent research has identified three phases that each leader-follower dyad goes through as one moves from out-group to in-group: stranger, acquaintance, and partner. As the relationship moves from stranger to partner, mutual trust, respect, and obligation toward each other develops.

LMX is widely researched and accurately depicts leader-member relationships. It explains why leaders often develop “go-to” people and utilize their skills more than others. LMX was also the first theory to focus its study on the leader-member relationship, rather than just the leader’s attributes or behavior. However, LMX is merely a descriptive theory. While it explains that mutual trust and respect develop as dyads progress, it fails to explain how or why this occurs. Likewise, it accurately explains leader-member interactions but it does not prescribe any method or model for developing in-group relationships.


More Articles in This Series:

HOME_AboutDavidBurkus

About the author

David Burkus is an organizational psychologist, keynote speaker, and bestselling author of five books on leadership and teamwork.

Recommended Reading

What Leaders Get Wrong About Emotional Intelligence

We’ve been talking about emotional intelligence for decades now. And honestly? We’re still not doing it very well. Daniel Goleman first popularized the concept back in the 1990s—yes, the 1900s—and broke it down into four key components: self-awareness, self-regulation, social awareness, and relationship management. Since then, leaders have nodded along through countless workshops, flipped through […]

Why Underdogs Win (More Often Than They Should)

I was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the city known throughout the world for two things: Throwing snowballs at Santa Claus, and Its embrace of underdogs. The Ultimate Underdog Story When you think about Philadelphians, you should start with this simple fact: our most celebrated sports hero is a fictional character who loses a boxing match […]

5 Questions Leaders Should Always Be Asking

Leaders don’t need to have all the answers. That sounds counterintuitive. There is a lot of pressure on leaders to have the right answers and to solve problems that team members can’t solve on their own. In fact, most leaders were promoted into a leadership role because they had many more of the right answers […]

Scroll to Top