Contingency Theory

Published on February 18, 2010. Updated on December 15th, 2023.

What Is The Contingency Theory of Leadership?

Maybe leadership isn’t about who you are, what skills you have, or how you act. Maybe what defines effective leadership is about more than just you. This inquisitive contemplation brought forth the idea of Contingency theory, and moved the field of leadership theory forward by another drastic step.

Developed by Fielder, Contingency theory examines the leader in conjunction with the situation the leader is in. In essence, it argues that effective leadership is contingent upon a match between the leader’s style and the work situation. Leadership style is assessed using a measure called the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. This scale divides leaders into task motivated (low LPC), socio-independent (middle LPC), and relationship motivated.

Three different variables provide a means for situational measurement: leader-member relations, task structure (defined or undefined tasks), and position power (how much power does the leader have). When considered together, these variables suggest a style of leadership that has the best chance of success. Generally, low LPCs are found effective in extreme combinations with high LPCs effective in moderate situations.

Contingency theory is easily measurable, and as a result has a considerable amount of research supporting it. As mentioned, it represents the first theory to consider more than just the attributes of leaders but also the situation leaders can find themselves in. While it is supported by substantial research, an adequate explanation of why it works has yet to be discovered. Contingency theory is merely predictive. It can predict which leaders will be effective in what situations but cannot be used to make leaders in unfavorable situations more effective.

More Articles in This Series:

HOME_AboutDavidBurkus

About the author

David Burkus is an organizational psychologist, keynote speaker, and bestselling author of five books on leadership and teamwork.

Learn More

Recommended Reading

Why Leaders Fail

John Maxwell famously said, “everything rises and falls on leadership.” Although research offers a more nuanced picture. For an organization to succeed, it takes a variety of contributions from talented individuals at all levels. But when leaders fail, the whole organization can indeed fall. In this article, we’ll review several reasons why leaders fail. Failure […]

How to Run a Leadership Retreat: What Actually Makes Leadership Offsites Work

A leadership retreat can be one of the costliest meetings your organization will hold all year—and one of the most likely to underperform. A survey from MIT Sloan found that only 34 percent of executive teams report strong alignment on strategic priorities after their annual leadership offsite. And that’s a huge missed opportunity, because research […]

How To Plan A Leadership Summit That Drives Real Results

Most leadership summits fail before anyone sets foot in the room. Not because of bad venues or cold coffee—but because of a gap between what these gatherings could produce and what they actually deliver. A leadership summit is one of the most significant investments an organization makes all year. The event pulls 150 or 200 […]

Scroll to Top