Contingency Theory

Published on February 18, 2010. Updated on December 15th, 2023.

What Is The Contingency Theory of Leadership?

Maybe leadership isn’t about who you are, what skills you have, or how you act. Maybe what defines effective leadership is about more than just you. This inquisitive contemplation brought forth the idea of Contingency theory, and moved the field of leadership theory forward by another drastic step.

Developed by Fielder, Contingency theory examines the leader in conjunction with the situation the leader is in. In essence, it argues that effective leadership is contingent upon a match between the leader’s style and the work situation. Leadership style is assessed using a measure called the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. This scale divides leaders into task motivated (low LPC), socio-independent (middle LPC), and relationship motivated.

Three different variables provide a means for situational measurement: leader-member relations, task structure (defined or undefined tasks), and position power (how much power does the leader have). When considered together, these variables suggest a style of leadership that has the best chance of success. Generally, low LPCs are found effective in extreme combinations with high LPCs effective in moderate situations.

Contingency theory is easily measurable, and as a result has a considerable amount of research supporting it. As mentioned, it represents the first theory to consider more than just the attributes of leaders but also the situation leaders can find themselves in. While it is supported by substantial research, an adequate explanation of why it works has yet to be discovered. Contingency theory is merely predictive. It can predict which leaders will be effective in what situations but cannot be used to make leaders in unfavorable situations more effective.

More Articles in This Series:

HOME_AboutDavidBurkus

About the author

David Burkus is an organizational psychologist, keynote speaker, and bestselling author of five books on leadership and teamwork.

Learn More

Recommended Reading

Why Introverted Leaders Might Be Better Than You Think

When we picture leadership, we almost always picture the same thing: someone confident, charismatic, outgoing—someone who walks into a room and commands attention. For decades, that image has sent a quiet but damaging message to anyone who doesn’t fit the mold: if you’re an introvert, leadership probably isn’t for you. But here’s the thing—that assumption […]

How Strengths-Based Leadership Affects Teams

Strength-based leadership focuses on each individual’s core strengths. The methodology believes that when we work on these unique strengths, the team becomes more productive, successful, and involved in the task at hand. Encouragement is an important tool here, as when people work in their areas of strength, they can perform better and contribute more effort. […]

Trait Theory [Everything You Need to Know]

The search for the characteristics or traits of leaders has existed for centuries. History’s greatest philosophical writings, from Plato’s Republic to Plutarch’s Lives, have explored the question of, “What qualities distinguish an individual as a leader?”  Underlying this search was the early recognition of the importance of leadership and the assumption that leadership is rooted […]

Scroll to Top