If you’re feeling overwhelmed as a manager, you’ve probably already diagnosed yourself, and the diagnosis isn’t kind. The one-on-ones keep getting moved. Someone on your team has been struggling for three weeks, you’ve known the whole time, and if you’re honest, you’ve already lost track of which person it is. It’s easy to conclude you’re just not very good at this leadership thing.
You probably are. The problem is arithmetic.
When Gallup analyzed data from more than 16,000 U.S. managers, they found that 97% are still carrying individual-contributor work on top of leading people. The median manager spends 40% of the week on it. That’s the code, the deck, the client call, the thing you were good at before you got promoted. Do the math on a five-day week and a typical manager is leading their team in about three days, then wondering why three days doesn’t feel like enough.
The two diagnoses we reach for first
When a manager starts to slip, everybody reaches for the same explanation: too many direct reports. The team got too big. It’s a span-of-control problem.
It’s the first place we look because team size is the only thing on the org chart we can actually see. And with so many organizations talking about flattening, it’s an explanation a lot of managers are about to hear.
The second diagnosis is the one we give ourselves. I just need to prioritize better. That one feels responsible, even virtuous. It’s also a reliable way to turn a structural problem into a personal failing.
Neither holds up well against the evidence.
What actually explains feeling overwhelmed as a manager
In the same Gallup research, how many people a manager led mattered less than how that manager spent their time. Managers who kept individual-contributor work at or under 40% of their week reported their own engagement at about 37%. That number held flat whether they had four direct reports or twenty-five. Above that 40% line, the pattern changed: engagement slid from 36% to 32% as team size grew.
A few caveats matter here. This is correlational data. It measures the manager’s own engagement, not the team’s, and the gap is a handful of points. Gallup’s own headline takeaway was that manager talent matters even more than span of control. But talent isn’t something you can change by Friday. The ratio is.
The number of people isn’t what breaks a manager. The second job is. And 40% is a number that should have been in your job description, but almost certainly wasn’t.
Why the coaching always gets cut first
If you’ve spent many weeks over that line, you’ve probably noticed that what gets cut is never the deliverable. It’s the feedback, the coaching, the development conversation.
There’s a reason for that. Individual-contributor work has a deadline. It has a deliverable. Somebody is waiting for it, and when you finish it, it’s finished. Leadership work has none of those properties. Nobody sends a calendar invite for notice that Sarah has been quiet for three weeks.
Researchers Meng Zhu, Yang Yang, and Christopher Hsee ran five experiments in which people chose between a task that was merely urgent and one that paid more. People reliably chose the urgent one. It wasn’t worth more; it just felt like it was about to expire. They called it the mere urgency effect.
That’s your calendar. The leadership half of your job doesn’t get cut in one dramatic moment of bad judgment. It quietly loses, week after week, to things that beep.
That’s also why “prioritize better” isn’t the answer. Consider a commercial flight deck. The roles are split: one pilot flies the aircraft, and the other’s job is to monitor the instruments, run the checklist, and catch the error. That isn’t because one of them is junior. It’s because nobody does both well at once. When NASA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System reviewed 200 incidents where flight-deck monitoring broke down, 170 of the reports recorded what else the crew was doing at the time. The most common answer was programming the flight management system. Heads down, doing the technical work.
Aviation solved this by assigning the split. Nobody assigned yours. So the fix isn’t willpower. It’s design.
Three changes worth making right now
First, spend sixty seconds before every one-on-one. The standard advice is to block the time and defend it. That gets your body into the room, but not necessarily your attention. When you switch tasks, especially away from something unfinished, part of your mind stays behind. Organizational psychologist Sophie Leroy calls this attention residue.
In four studies, Leroy and Theresa Glomb interrupted people mid-task under time pressure, then gave them a judgment-heavy task: evaluating résumés. One group got a single instruction before switching: write down where you stopped and what you’d do next. That group carried less residue into the new task, and their performance on it held up. The fix is one line, not a to-do list: Stopped on the pricing slide, next thing is check the Q3 numbers with Dana. Your brain isn’t clinging to the work. It’s clinging to the open loop, and writing it down closes the loop without finishing the task. You’re not protecting the time. You’re closing a loop so the time you protected actually has you in it.
Second, put a recurring conversation on the calendar. If urgency always wins, stop fighting it and manufacture some. Gallup’s research found that employees who strongly agreed they’d received meaningful feedback in the past week were engaged at roughly seven in ten. Those who didn’t were engaged at roughly one in four. That pattern held across every team size, in data spanning seven studies and more than 44,000 responses. It’s correlational, but it’s consistent. The conversation doesn’t need to be long; Gallup’s guidance is fifteen to thirty minutes, done consistently. It also isn’t a status check. What employees describe as meaningful is recognition for recent work, a discussion of their goals and priorities, and something about what they’re good at.
A standing meeting is the only piece of leadership work with a deadline built in. It shows up Tuesday at two whether or not the deck is done. When you have to move it, don’t cancel; reschedule in the same message and own it: I have to move Thursday, that’s on me. Can we do Friday at nine? An open door is a promise. A standing appointment is a deadline.
Third, cut the paper before you cut the craft. When managers finally decide to get under 40%, most cut the hands-on work first, because it feels like the part that isn’t really their job anymore. That’s likely backwards. Benjamin Artz, Amanda Goodall, and Andrew Oswald analyzed data on more than 27,000 American workers, along with roughly 1,600 British workers who were asked a pointed question: could your supervisor do your job if you were away? A supervisor’s technical competence was the strongest single predictor of job satisfaction, outweighing pay and hours.
The data are correlational, and the authors are careful about interpretation. Still, the effect held even when they followed the same workers in the same jobs at the same workplaces.
It makes sense once you say it out loud. A manager who still understands the work gives feedback people can use. They can’t be fooled and they can’t be panicked, and when they say the work is good, it means something. So sort your week into work that keeps you fluent in what your team does and work that just moves paper: the status report, the recurring update nobody reads, the meeting you’re in because you were in it last year. Cut the paper first, all of it, before you touch the craft.
Start with the number
Don’t try all three this week. Start with the one that costs nothing. Track one week, mark every block on your calendar as either the team or your own work, and calculate the percentage. You might come in at 30% and be fine. You might come in at 65% and finally have an explanation for being overwhelmed as a manager that isn’t a character flaw.
Being a player-coach isn’t the problem. Being a player-coach with no idea of the ratio is. You were handed two roles and a title that describes one of them, then measured on the half nobody put a number on. And you can’t coach someone out of arithmetic.
About the author
David Burkus is an organizational psychologist, keynote speaker, and bestselling author of five books on leadership and teamwork.